Methods: In 2018, this cross-sectional study was conducted on 21 participants (male = 11) with an age range of 19–25 years. Having emmetropia and 10/10 visual acuity in both eyes were conditions of the inclusion criteria for the crosssectional study. The following aspects of binocular function including amplitude of accommodation (AA), near point of convergence, near phoria, and monocular accommodative facility were evaluated in five gazes (primary, upward, downward, left, and right) for all subjects. Results: Near point of convergence values showed significant differences in all gaze positions (P < 0. 001). The lowest near point of convergence value was seen in the primary gaze (2. 69 cm) and the downward gaze (3. 47 cm) and the highest near point of convergence value was seen in the left gaze (7. 5 cm). There was also a significant difference in the amplitude of accommodation among the upward, downward, and the primary gaze (P < 0. 001) positions but no difference was observed among the temporal, nasal, and the primary gaze positions. There was a significant difference in near phoria between the upward gaze and the primary gaze (P = 0. 008) while no significant differences were observed among the other gazes. There was no significant variance in the monocular accommodative facility among the different gaze positions (P = 0. 175). Conclusion: The results of this study indicated variations that exist in the convergence and accommodation reflex functions in multiple gaze positions, which proved to be more prominent in the convergence system. Although the accommodative sufficiency evaluation was inconsistent among the multiple gaze positions, the accommodative facility evaluation was consistent in all gazes.